Wrapping It Up For the Holidays

December 1, 2008 at 4:32 pm 3 comments


Carol Singer Neuvelt

From Black Friday to today’s Cyber Monday, our consumption and spending greatly increase this time of year. This post-Thanksgiving focus on purchasing, spending and “doing” has highlighted the fact that our personal choices DO make a difference.

Professionally, we focus on processes & creating systems that allow us to measure our progress. As the saying goes, “What gets measured; gets managed.”  So on a personal front, I ask “how do I measure the impacts of my decisions?”

Looking to have a bit of fun with this, the staff at NAEM researched a number of the carbon footprint calculator sites to measure impact. We had mixed results and were surprised to see that very few of the calculators took into account anything beyond utilities and transportation.

Here’s a selection of sites with different methodologies.  I’d like your opinion from the perspective of EHS & Sustainability managers who measure and manage every day.  Take a look at these sites and share what you found most surprising. Did ordering take-out three nights a week greatly increase your footprint – just like it did to mine? Did your utility usage count for almost nothing compared to the impact of your daily commute? Which sites are your favorites (NAEM definitely has a few!) and which ones will you share with your peers & family?

Finally, how do these calculators influence you as you’re revving up to buy & wrap your holiday gifts?


Entry filed under: Sustainability. Tags: , , , , , , , .

Give Washington, DC Your 2¢ Becoming Recession Proof

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Kelvin Roth  |  December 1, 2008 at 4:36 pm

    Until I quit traveling for work, the other things don’t seem to matter

  • 2. Alan Palter  |  December 1, 2008 at 6:14 pm

    It’s an interesting question, and one that deserves our attention. I’ve always tried to focus our attention on measuring what matters (though for many reasons beyond carbon, there are items that we all need to measure). Also, there are items a company can “control,” and other items that may be MUCH more significant, but which the company can’t control. PLUS, some stakeholders simply “expect” that you will do certain things (i.e. paper recycling) even if it is far less “important” than things you are not yet doing.

    From some recent analyses I’ve seen, it makes more sense for my company to decrease employee auto commuting than it does to improve the energy efficiency of the building they work in.

  • 3. Nancy Neely  |  December 4, 2008 at 6:46 pm

    Yes, I found that retirement does help reduce the footprint. Minimum airflight now and mimimum auto usage, really cuts transportation energy usage.

    Carol, it was great that you put all the helpful internet sites together. Use of these website tools is a good way to encourage employees to analyze the impact of their individual activities toward commitment-support of ISO14001/Sustainability programs.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 211 other followers

Like NAEM on Facebook!

Follow us on Twitter @thegreentie



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 211 other followers

%d bloggers like this: